What is the service layer in DDD?

6

Reading about DDD I've heard about the service layer and I'm a bit doubtful about it because from what I read a service can tell business logic. Basically the definition I saw is this:

  

Services are classes that contain business logic, but which do not belong to any Entity or Values Objects. It is important to emphasize that Services do not keep state, that is, every call to the same service, given the same precondition, should always return the same result.

In another text I read that there are three types of services: application services, infrastructure services and domain services, and the type of service we are dealing with at the service layer of the DDD is domain services. >

What leaves me in doubt is the fact that such services contain business logic. Should business logic not be completely contained in domain types? What are these domain services really and how can we identify them?

    
asked by Leonardo 05.02.2015 в 19:28
source

2 answers

9
  

In DDD, should business logic not be completely contained in domain types?

Yes. And, in DDD, Services are actually domain objects.

In DDD, Services are not a layer but rather a type of business object.

  

What are these domain services really and how can we identify them?

The way to identify them is in your quote, but I would write differently:

  

In DDD, Services are objects that contain business logic that does not belong naturally to any Entity.

The difference between my affirmation and your quote is that I took the comma and the "but". There is no "but / yet / however /" in the Services definition. They simply are what they are. I also took the "business logic that does not belong to Value Objects" because Value Object never has a business rule.

How to choose where a business logic should reside

View a business rule and identify which business it belongs to. The question to ask is: "Which entity should have this behavior?" If you can not determine and the design is ok then this business rule belongs to a Service and not to an Entity.

Eventually a business rule appears to belong to an Entity, but it will affect many entities of that type and not just a single instance - in this case business logic also belongs to a service.

Entity Behaviors

See this business rule:

  • Download an incoming payment account that was paid today.

If you have a AccountReceive entity, this business logic belongs to this entity. You get the Intent of this entity and invokes your LowQuestion behavior:

ContaReceber contaReceber = contaReceberRepo.get(contaId);
contaReceber.baixaPorQuitacao(dataReferencia);
contaReceberRepo.persist(contaReceber);

Service Behaviors

See this other business rule:

  • Purge uncollectible accounts receivable.

An incoming account has no way of knowing that it is uncollectible. To know which accounts are uncollectible, you need to get the parameters from somewhere. These parameters will be, for example: accounts that have been delayed for more than five years without interest on the part of the client. The knowledge contained in several other entities is required to find out which accounts payable meet this criterion.

This business rule of course does not belong to any Entity, so it belongs to a service, which would be, for example:

ServicoBaixaAutomatica servicoBaixaAutomatica = BaixaAutomaticaService.get();
servicoBaixaAutomatica.expurgarIncobraveis(dataReferencia)

Complementing

Business or domain objects, in DDD, do not constitute layers; on the contrary, they all reside on the same layer, the business layer (of course), usually called domain .

The layers in DDD are:

  • Interfaces: is the interface of the system with the outside world. It could be for example a graphical user interface or a service frontend.
  • Application: contains the mechanics of the application, directs business objects to user interactions or other systems.
  • Domain: layer where business objects reside (Entities, Value Objects, Aggregations, Services, Factories, Repositories).
  • Infrastructure: supports the other layers, offering for example mapping between business and database objects and access services to these databases.
answered by 05.02.2015 / 21:34
source
1

Making logic out of domain types allows you to apply a design pattern known as MVC ( M odel- V > iew- ontroller) where model takes care of application data, view is the graphical interface that the user interacts with, and the controller(s) is (are ) the logical part of the application itself.

The flow of a user action in this project pattern is like this:

  • User interacts with the view. (Informs values and sends them through a form, for example)
  • The view mounts an object with the values entered by the user and sends it to the controller. (A query request in a DB for data of a specific person)
  • The controller then executes the order and collects the results.
  • The controller makes changes to the model, if necessary, or gathers its data for the result of the order.
  • The controller returns these results to the view. (Returns the objects of the model that are equivalent to those of the query in the DB)
  • The view then displays the form results on the screen. (Returns a table with the data retrieved by the query)
  • Domain services can be easily identified as the functional requirements of your application.

        
    answered by 05.02.2015 в 19:46